Before anything else: if you are comparing eUnify against TOPS, you are comparing it against a product that has been renamed. TOPS[ONE] is now Enumerate Central. Enumerate's own company page states that the experience behind the business was shaped by the teams that built and supported TOPS Software, Nabr Network, and ComWeb, and the 2023 launch announcement named TOPS Software and Nabr Network as the core products moving forward under the Enumerate name. Search results and review sites still carry the old name, which is why the two get compared under mismatched labels.
With that settled, the comparison is a real one: two long-standing community association platforms, both of which serve management companies and self-managed associations, and only one of which publishes a price floor. Sources read in August 2026.
We make Effortless HOA, which is HOA management software. That means we compete with both products on this page, and you should read what follows with that in mind.
We have not used eUnify or Enumerate (formerly TOPS). Nothing here is a review, a rating, or a test result. Every statement is drawn from what each vendor publishes on its own website — pricing pages, product pages, FAQs — read in August 2026, with the source links printed at the bottom of this page. Where a vendor does not publish something, this page says “not published” rather than guessing.
Vendors change pages and prices without notice. Verify anything that matters against the source links before you sign.
A community association platform organized into Operations & Management, Finance & Payments, Community & Lifestyle, AI & Automation, and mobile apps (uManage).
Built for: eUnify publishes audiences by community type, including self-managed associations — "built for communities doing it all themselves" — alongside management companies, master-planned communities, high-rise and condo, and commercial or developer communities.
Enumerate
Enumerate Central (accounting, payments, operations — formerly TOPS[ONE]), Enumerate Engage (homeowner and board communications), Numa AI, and Enumerate Financial Services for professional bookkeeping.
Built for: Published audiences include property management companies and self-managed associations, plus managers, accounting staff, executives, and board members. Enumerate publishes 40 years of experience serving community associations.
This is the most decision-relevant published fact on this page. Enumerate states a $500 monthly minimum, an annual contract requirement, and a one-time implementation fee covering data migration. For a single association of 60 homes, $500 a month is $100 per home per year on software alone, which is usually the end of the conversation — the published floor tells you Enumerate is priced for portfolios, notwithstanding that it lists self-managed associations among its audiences. eUnify publishes no price at all, so its floor is unknown. It is worth asking eUnify for a minimum before scoping anything, because "we serve self-managed associations" and "we have a workable price for one small association" are different claims.
eUnify publishes Violations & Inspections as a named module — "track, assign, and resolve violations with automated follow-ups" — alongside Architectural Review with "custom ARC submission, review, and approval workflows," work orders, meeting management, and resale and closing documents. Enumerate publishes operations and accounting automation including collections letters and fines, without breaking violations out into a named module with published workflow detail. If violation tracking is the specific job you are buying for, eUnify has put more of it in writing. Ask both to run one violation from a photo in the field to a fine posted on the owner ledger.
eUnify publishes "true bank sync, no third-party add-ons needed" and lists 20+ partner integrations including First Citizens Bank, Webster Bank, and Sunwest, along with homeowner payments, AP and vendor payments, accounts receivable, general ledger, budgeting and reporting, and point of sale. Enumerate publishes accounting, payments and operations as one connected system, with named reports such as the Owner Balance Report and Collection Status Report, and optional professional bookkeeping. The published difference is emphasis: eUnify names the bank relationships, Enumerate names the reports and offers to do the bookkeeping for you.
eUnify publishes an AI Invoice Agent, an AI Assistant, an AI Bank Rec Agent, document processing, and a custom workflow builder. Enumerate publishes Numa AI with Ask Numa for insights, automated bank reconciliation transaction matching, and Homeowner Assist for resident support. The overlap is almost exact — invoice handling, bank reconciliation, and a question-answering assistant are the three jobs the whole category has converged on. Neither publishes accuracy figures. Treat both as needing a human review step on anything that touches an owner's ledger.
eUnify lists Surveys & eVoting under its Community & Lifestyle module, alongside homeowner and board portals, amenity reservations, resident communication, and event ticketing. Enumerate publishes Enumerate Engage for homeowner and board communications and payments but does not publish an elections or voting product. If your associations run annual elections and want them online, that is a published difference — though as always, ask rather than assuming the absence is real.
No public pricing page
Published floor, annual contract
Each cell records what the vendor states on its own pages. A blank in one column usually means the vendor does not publish that detail — not that the capability is missing. Treat it as a question for the demo, not a verdict.
Current product name
Published price
Contract
Implementation fee
Self-managed associations
Violations
Architectural review
Resale and closing documents
Meeting management
Core accounting
Bank connectivity
Outsourced bookkeeping
Online voting
Amenity reservations
Named AI
Mobile apps
Neither is better in the abstract. These are the conditions under which each vendor’s published strengths line up with a real situation.
These are the gaps in the public record. Anyone who fills them in for you without a quote in hand is guessing.
Questions that close the gaps above, in the order they usually matter.
We make Effortless HOA, so we are not a neutral party and this section is the part of the page where that matters. We built it for self-managed communities — volunteer boards running one association without a management company. That is a narrower job than either platform above is solving, and it is the only situation where we would suggest looking at us instead.
If you are a management company with a portfolio, or you need multi-entity portfolio operations, the platforms on this page are built for that and we are not. If you are a board of five volunteers trying to collect dues, track violations, and close the books without hiring anybody, our pricing is published in full and you can work out your number in about a minute.
Vendor-published pages, read August 2026. Last verified 2026-08-09.
Two enterprise platforms for management companies. Neither publishes a price. Here is what each one does put in writing.
Read the comparisonA mixed-portfolio property management platform against a community-association specialist. What each one publishes, and what neither does.
Read the comparisonBuildium publishes tiers and transaction fees. Vantaca quotes per portfolio. The gap between them is mostly about scale.
Read the comparisonBoth publish complete price lists, including transaction fees. That makes this the one matchup you can settle with a spreadsheet.
Read the comparisonLooking for how we compare instead? See Effortless HOA head-to-head comparisons.